<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The infiltration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and &#8220;integrative medicine&#8221; into academia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=28" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28</link>
	<description>Exploring issues and controversies in the relationship between science and medicine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:31:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The David and Goliath Myth &#171; The SkeptVet Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-24921</link>
		<dc:creator>The David and Goliath Myth &#171; The SkeptVet Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-24921</guid>
		<description>[...] as inheritors of folk tradition and wisdom that does not require academic validation. Yet they aggressively promote their agendas in these same academic institutions and set up their own credentialing and degree programs to take advantage of the legitimacy and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as inheritors of folk tradition and wisdom that does not require academic validation. Yet they aggressively promote their agendas in these same academic institutions and set up their own credentialing and degree programs to take advantage of the legitimacy and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; When &#8220;CAM&#8221; is mandatory: A science-based medical student&#8217;s dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-16113</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; When &#8220;CAM&#8221; is mandatory: A science-based medical student&#8217;s dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-16113</guid>
		<description>[...] (CAM) or &#8220;integrative medicine&#8221; (IM) modalities into American medical schools. In it, I listed the medical schools that had embraced pseudoscience through having started a CAM/IM program (a list desperately in need [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (CAM) or &#8220;integrative medicine&#8221; (IM) modalities into American medical schools. In it, I listed the medical schools that had embraced pseudoscience through having started a CAM/IM program (a list desperately in need [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Dismantling NCCAM: A How-To Primer</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-12419</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Dismantling NCCAM: A How-To Primer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-12419</guid>
		<description>[...] of the earliest posts I wrote for Science-Based Medicine were entitled The infiltration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and “integrative medicine” into... and The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM): Your tax dollars hard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the earliest posts I wrote for Science-Based Medicine were entitled The infiltration of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and “integrative medicine” into&#8230; and The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM): Your tax dollars hard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Chopra and Weil and Roy, oh my! Or: The Wall Street Journal, coopted.</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-11909</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Chopra and Weil and Roy, oh my! Or: The Wall Street Journal, coopted.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-11909</guid>
		<description>[...] why &#8220;integrating&#8221; pseudoscience with medical science is not a good idea. I myself have lamented the infiltration of pseudoscience and outright quackery into medical academia and the role that the National Center [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] why &#8220;integrating&#8221; pseudoscience with medical science is not a good idea. I myself have lamented the infiltration of pseudoscience and outright quackery into medical academia and the role that the National Center [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; &#8220;Battlefield acupuncture&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-11256</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; &#8220;Battlefield acupuncture&#8221;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-11256</guid>
		<description>[...] hospital, or military hospitals overseas or in the U.S. Unfortunately, as I and my cobloggers have documented for academia, there appears to be a major push by its advocates to introduce so-called &#8220;complementary and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hospital, or military hospitals overseas or in the U.S. Unfortunately, as I and my cobloggers have documented for academia, there appears to be a major push by its advocates to introduce so-called &#8220;complementary and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; How SHOULD We Discuss Quackery with Innocents and the Not-so-Innocent?</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-11226</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; How SHOULD We Discuss Quackery with Innocents and the Not-so-Innocent?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 01:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-11226</guid>
		<description>[...] hypothetical &#8220;witch doctor.&#8221; When he lamented academic medicine&#8217;s current dalliances with quackery, it brought to mind the NCCAM, David Katz, Andrew Weil, Bravewell , and their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hypothetical &#8220;witch doctor.&#8221; When he lamented academic medicine&#8217;s current dalliances with quackery, it brought to mind the NCCAM, David Katz, Andrew Weil, Bravewell , and their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Autism&#8217;s false prophets revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-9094</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Autism&#8217;s false prophets revealed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-9094</guid>
		<description>[...] Actually, I (and all of my cobloggers here, I daresay) would argue that that is exactly what has happened with the rise of NCCAM. Dr. Offit then goes on to argue that NCCAM has tested &#8220;several alternative medicines&#8221; and concluded that they didn&#8217;t work, mentioning laetrile. Actually laetrile was tested and found to be ineffective back in the 1980s, several years before the office that was the precursor to NCCCAM was ever established in the NIH. In any case, if he sees this review, I invite Dr. Offit to read articles by Wally Sampson, Steve Novella, Kimball Atwood, and me that argue otherwise and that NCCAM is a corrosive force against science-based medicine and for the accelerating infiltration of pseudoscience into academic medicine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Actually, I (and all of my cobloggers here, I daresay) would argue that that is exactly what has happened with the rise of NCCAM. Dr. Offit then goes on to argue that NCCAM has tested &#8220;several alternative medicines&#8221; and concluded that they didn&#8217;t work, mentioning laetrile. Actually laetrile was tested and found to be ineffective back in the 1980s, several years before the office that was the precursor to NCCCAM was ever established in the NIH. In any case, if he sees this review, I invite Dr. Offit to read articles by Wally Sampson, Steve Novella, Kimball Atwood, and me that argue otherwise and that NCCAM is a corrosive force against science-based medicine and for the accelerating infiltration of pseudoscience into academic medicine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Threats to science-based medicine: When clinical trials for new drugs are designed by the marketing division</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-8377</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Threats to science-based medicine: When clinical trials for new drugs are designed by the marketing division</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-8377</guid>
		<description>[...] among medical professionals that medicine should be science- and evidence-based. Moreover, the infiltration of pseudoscientific and antiscientific woo into medical schools, academic medical centers, and medicine at large, coupled with large amounts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] among medical professionals that medicine should be science- and evidence-based. Moreover, the infiltration of pseudoscientific and antiscientific woo into medical schools, academic medical centers, and medicine at large, coupled with large amounts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; The New England Journal of Medicine Disappoints</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-8323</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; The New England Journal of Medicine Disappoints</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-8323</guid>
		<description>[...] endorsements of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] endorsements of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Science, Reason, Ethics, and Modern Medicine, Part 4: is &#8220;CAM&#8221; the only Alternative?</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-7387</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Science, Reason, Ethics, and Modern Medicine, Part 4: is &#8220;CAM&#8221; the only Alternative?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-7387</guid>
		<description>[...] bio and</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bio and</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Resistance is futile? Hell, no! (A call to arms)</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-6608</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Resistance is futile? Hell, no! (A call to arms)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-6608</guid>
		<description>[...] I and others have pointed out, quackery has infiltrated academic medicine to such an extent that not only are many of our major academic medical centers dedicating [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I and others have pointed out, quackery has infiltrated academic medicine to such an extent that not only are many of our major academic medical centers dedicating [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; Resistance is futile</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-4912</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; Resistance is futile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-4912</guid>
		<description>[...] advantage and winning. Indeed, I&#8217;ve written about this before on this very blog, including my (in)famous list of medical schools that have embraced CAM and my lament about a medical school that has even gone so far as to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advantage and winning. Indeed, I&#8217;ve written about this before on this very blog, including my (in)famous list of medical schools that have embraced CAM and my lament about a medical school that has even gone so far as to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; The ultimate in &#8220;integrative medicine&#8221;: Integrating the unscientific into the medical school curriculum</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-2111</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; The ultimate in &#8220;integrative medicine&#8221;: Integrating the unscientific into the medical school curriculum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-2111</guid>
		<description>[...] was his segment on the &#8220;woo-ification&#8221; of health care, which very much echoed my post a while back in which I lamented the creeping infiltration of non-science-based modalities into [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was his segment on the &#8220;woo-ification&#8221; of health care, which very much echoed my post a while back in which I lamented the creeping infiltration of non-science-based modalities into [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery Comarow attacked by America&#8217;s Natural Physician&#38;trade; [Terra Sigillata] &#124; NewAge.org</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery Comarow attacked by America&#8217;s Natural Physician&#38;trade; [Terra Sigillata] &#124; NewAge.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>[...] the accompanying video commentary on the article (here), was cited by a commenter on Science Based Medicine as follows: &#8220;The US News &amp; World Report article has a video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the accompanying video commentary on the article (here), was cited by a commenter on Science Based Medicine as follows: &#8220;The US News &amp; World Report article has a video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloodied by both sides [Terra Sigillata] &#124; NewAge.org</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloodied by both sides [Terra Sigillata] &#124; NewAge.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>[...] in that perception. In fact, the accompanying video commentary on the article (here), was cited by a commenter on Science Based Medicine as follows: &#8220;The US News &amp; World Report article has a video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in that perception. In fact, the accompanying video commentary on the article (here), was cited by a commenter on Science Based Medicine as follows: &#8220;The US News &amp; World Report article has a video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science-Based Medicine &#187; The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM): Your tax dollars hard at work</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Science-Based Medicine &#187; The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM): Your tax dollars hard at work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-784</guid>
		<description>[...] for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, better known by its abbrevation NCCAM? As I&#8217;ve pointed out before, I used to be somewhat of a supporter of NCCAM. I really did, back when I was more naïve and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, better known by its abbrevation NCCAM? As I&#8217;ve pointed out before, I used to be somewhat of a supporter of NCCAM. I really did, back when I was more naïve and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isles</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>isles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-567</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to come up with a list of promising research  projects that didn&#039;t get funded by NIH, and see how many of those studies could have been funded using NCCAM&#039;s budget.  Is there a good place to find that information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to come up with a list of promising research  projects that didn&#8217;t get funded by NIH, and see how many of those studies could have been funded using NCCAM&#8217;s budget.  Is there a good place to find that information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalMD</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>PalMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-561</guid>
		<description>How &#039;bout &quot;modern shamanism&quot;?  They&#039;d like it, I&#039;d like it, and it&#039;s accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How &#8217;bout &#8220;modern shamanism&#8221;?  They&#8217;d like it, I&#8217;d like it, and it&#8217;s accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Niles</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Niles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-559</guid>
		<description>How about calling it QAP (questionable alternative practices)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about calling it QAP (questionable alternative practices)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prup aka Jim Benton</title>
		<link>http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28&#038;cpage=1#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Prup aka Jim Benton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=28#comment-558</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to comment on the substance of the debate here, the rest of you have done a fine job of that.

But as Dr. Gorski (Hi, Dave, glad to know your last name at last) knows from comments I&#039;ve made to him on his blog and in e-mail, I am trying to get the Skeptical Community -- and especially the Medical Skeptics -- to stop using the term CAM.  Medicine is what the bloggers here do, and my family doctor does.  What these quacks do is no more medicine than what creationists do is &#039;alternative geology.&#039;

But by letting them use the CAM term -- or by diluting the term medicine by referring to it as &#039;allopathic medicine&#039; -- we are conceding the &#039;linguistic high ground&#039; to the (religious or non religious) faith healers who give us homeopathy, reiki, magic &#039;purifying&#039; foot wipes, etc. 

Even worse, we let the innocent believer respond &#039;what do you mean X is not medicine?  See, even the government calls it medicine.&#039;

I have suggested the terms &#039;ATM&#039; (for alternative therapy methods) or ATP (Alternative Therapy Practices).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to comment on the substance of the debate here, the rest of you have done a fine job of that.</p>
<p>But as Dr. Gorski (Hi, Dave, glad to know your last name at last) knows from comments I&#8217;ve made to him on his blog and in e-mail, I am trying to get the Skeptical Community &#8212; and especially the Medical Skeptics &#8212; to stop using the term CAM.  Medicine is what the bloggers here do, and my family doctor does.  What these quacks do is no more medicine than what creationists do is &#8216;alternative geology.&#8217;</p>
<p>But by letting them use the CAM term &#8212; or by diluting the term medicine by referring to it as &#8216;allopathic medicine&#8217; &#8212; we are conceding the &#8216;linguistic high ground&#8217; to the (religious or non religious) faith healers who give us homeopathy, reiki, magic &#8216;purifying&#8217; foot wipes, etc. </p>
<p>Even worse, we let the innocent believer respond &#8216;what do you mean X is not medicine?  See, even the government calls it medicine.&#8217;</p>
<p>I have suggested the terms &#8216;ATM&#8217; (for alternative therapy methods) or ATP (Alternative Therapy Practices).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
